🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard women from abuse, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final decision now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in Latvia last year, mandating authorities to establish laws and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a decision that rights groups characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the EU in last year, yet conservative factions have argued that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary political groups supporting the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread outcry both inside the country and internationally.

22,000 individuals have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a hasty decision driven by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the convention in 2021, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could potentially send back the legislation for further consideration if he holds objections.

President the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," stated a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in several European nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could affect comparable discussions in other EU countries